Strategizing Activities and Practices SAP

 View Only
  • 1.  CfP EGOS 2017 Sub-theme 51: Top Managers and Strategizing

    Posted 11-08-2016 04:29
    Dear Colleagues, 

    We would like to invite you to submit your short paper to our EGOS 2017 track on Top Managers and Strategizing. The goal of this track is to focus on the activities of top managers and TMTs in strategizing in order to encourage the development and integration of emerging research in this important area: http://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1442567999321&subtheme_id=1442568067823.

    Hope to see you in Copenhagen,

    Julia Balogun, Ann Langley, and Shenghui Ma 


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sub-theme 51: Top Managers and Strategizing

    Convenors:

    Julia Balogun
    University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

    Shenghui Ma
    University of Zurich, Switzerland

    Ann Langley
    HEC Montréal, Canada 


    Call for Papers (Deadline: January 09, 2017 ) 

    Over the last few years, there has been an increasing interest in studying the micro-activities and interactions of actors involved in strategy making (Golsorkhi, Rouleau, Seidl, & Vaara, 2015; Johnson, Langley, Melin, & Whittington, 2007; Whittington, 2006). Although this research has generated valuable insights on different types of strategy actors, such as middle managers (Balogun & Johnson, 2004; Rouleau & Balogun, 2011), we believe that there is room for more concerted attention to the roles and activities of top managers in this process. While there is a vast literature on the links between top managers and strategy, most studies focus on the demographic or personality composition of top management teams (TMTs) (Finkelstein, Hambrick, & Cannella, 2009; Nielsen, 2010). As a result, our understanding of what top managers actually do in the strategy process is still relatively limited (Jarzabkowski, 2008). Given the prominent role of top managers in strategizing, there is clearly a need to investigate their activities and interactions in order to more fully understand how strategy is shaped in organizations. In recent years, a number of such studies have begun to appear (Balogun,  Bartunek, & Do, 2015; Edmondson, Roberto, & Watkins, 2003; Jarzabkowski, 2008; Jarzabkowski & Wilson, 2002; Kisfalvi, Sergi, & Langley, 2016; Liu & Maitlis, 2014; Ma & Seidl, 2016; Ma, Seidl, & Guérard, 2015; Samra-Fredericks, 2003), and it is the goal of this subtheme to focus on the activities of top managers and TMTs in strategizing to encourage the development and integration of emerging research in this area.  

    Studies on top managers and strategizing can advance strategy research in at least four areas. First, by exploring the activities and interactions of top managers inside and outside TMTs, studies can provide rich insights into the contextual, interpersonal, processual and temporal dynamics of strategizing at the apex of an organization (Denis, Lamothe, & Langley, 2001). Such insights can enrich our understanding of strategy as a dynamic phenomenon and help resolve the "black-box" problem frequently raised in connection with demographic research on strategic leadership (Lawrence, 1997). Second, scholars can generate insights into the intervening mechanisms linking strategy work and outcomes. For example, existing studies have shown the importance of certain TMT processes (e.g., behavioral integration) but we know little about how they can be managed to ensure the effectiveness of decision-making. Third, such studies can also provide a better understanding of the co-evolution between characteristics of top managers as strategists (e.g., identity or legitimacy) and their strategizing activities, a topic that is important but has been underexplored. Finally, we need to know more about the interactions between top-level managers and other managers as responsibility for strategic change spreads outwards and downwards and how this influences strategizing. 

    In order to explore the topics discussed above, we call for papers that deal with the various aspects of strategizing activities in which top managers and TMTs are involved. We are interested both in conceptual and empirical papers utilizing a range of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. Possible topics for contributions include, but are not restricted to the following issues:
    • Activities of top managers in forming and realizing strategies. How do top managers engage in front-stage and back-stage activities of strategizing? How do top managers translate strategic plans to strategic actions? How do they push strategies to the front line? How do top managers sequence their interventions in realizing a strategy or strategic change? 
    • Different types of top managers in strategizing. What are the strategic roles of different types of top managers, such as CEOs, functional managers, divisional managers, senior staff (e.g., strategy officer), and subsidiary executives? What are their particular challenges and how do they deal with them in strategizing? 
    • Interplay between top managers as strategists and their activities. How does a top manager's or a TMT's identity, legitimacy, image, reputation, emotions or power shape, enable or constrain their strategizing activities? How is a top manager's or a TMT's identity, legitimacy, image, reputation or power shaped by their strategizing activities and outcomes? 
    • TMT processes in strategizing and intervention. How do top managers interact in the TMT to develop and implement strategies? What are the behavioral processes and patterns in TMTs and how do they influence strategizing activities and outcomes? How do different types of TMTs (e.g., with divisional structure vs. functional structure) operate in strategizing? How do CEOs (or others) manage TMT processes to mitigate their negative influence?
    • TMT formation/evolution and its relation to strategy. How are TMTs formed and how does that influence their strategizing activities? What are the drivers and constraints of configuring a TMT? Why are particular individuals included or excluded? How do TMTs evolve over time in terms of their composition and processes? How do TMT processes and the strategizing activities co-evolve over time?
    • Strategizing of top managers and TMTs in various contexts. How do top managers and TMTs strategize in different organizational contexts, e.g., during fast growth vs. performance declining? How do top managers and TMTs strategize in different institutional (e.g., public organizations, NGOs, etc.) and cultural contexts? 

    Julia Balogun is Director of School and Professor of Strategic Management at University of Liverpool Management School, UK. Her research focuses on strategy­as­practice, with a particular interest in strategic change and renewal within large mature corporations. She has a concern for how strategic activity is initiated and championed at multiple levels within organizations, exploring the strategizing work of both senior executives and middle managers. Her work is widely published in journals such as 'Academy of Management Journal', 'Organization Studies', 'Organization Science', 'Journal of Management Studies', 'Journal of International Business Studies'. Her book "Exploring Strategic Change" is in its fourth edition.

    Shenghui Ma is Senior Researcher at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. His research focuses on CEO succession, top management team dynamics, strategic change and sensemaking. He is particularly interested in the dynamics of how CEOs interact with other actors inside and outside their TMT in strategic decision making. He is currently a representative­at­large for the Strategy Practice IG at the Strategic Management Society. His work has been published in 'International Journal of Management Reviews' and 'Strategic Management Journal'.

    Ann Langley is Chair in Strategic Management in Pluralistic Settings at HEC Montréal, Canada. Her research focuses on strategic change, top management team dynamics and the practice of strategy in complex organizations. She is particularly interested in process­oriented research and methodology. She has published over 70 articles in refereed journals and is coeditor of the journal 'Strategic Organization'. She is also coeditor with Haridimos Tsoukas of a book series 'Perspectives on Process Organization Studies' published by Oxford University Press. She is Adjunct Professor at Université de Montréal, the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) and University of Gothenburg, Sweden.


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dr. Shenghui Ma | Senior Researcher
    University of Zurich | Chair of Organization & Management
    Universitätstrasse 84 | 8006 Zurich | Switzerland
    Tel : +41 44 634 29 04



  • 2.  CfP EGOS 2017 Sub-theme 51: Top Managers and Strategizing

    Posted 12-27-2016 12:47
    (Apologies for cross posting)

    Dear colleagues, 

    This is a kind reminder for submitting your short paper to our EGOS 2017 track "Top Managers and Strategizing". The goal of this track is to focus on the activities of top managers and TMTs in strategy process in order to encourage the development and integration of emerging research in this important area: http://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1442567999321&subtheme_id=1442568067823.

    Hope to see you in Copenhagen,

    Julia Balogun, Ann Langley, and Shenghui Ma 


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sub-theme 51: Top Managers and Strategizing

    Convenors:

    Julia Balogun
    University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

    Shenghui Ma
    University of Zurich, Switzerland

    Ann Langley
    HEC Montréal, Canada 


    Call for Papers (Deadline: January 09, 2017 ) 

    Over the last few years, there has been an increasing interest in studying the micro-activities and interactions of actors involved in strategy making (Golsorkhi, Rouleau, Seidl, & Vaara, 2015; Johnson, Langley, Melin, & Whittington, 2007; Whittington, 2006). Although this research has generated valuable insights on different types of strategy actors, such as middle managers (Balogun & Johnson, 2004; Rouleau & Balogun, 2011), we believe that there is room for more concerted attention to the roles and activities of top managers in this process. While there is a vast literature on the links between top managers and strategy, most studies focus on the demographic or personality composition of top management teams (TMTs) (Finkelstein, Hambrick, & Cannella, 2009; Nielsen, 2010). As a result, our understanding of what top managers actually do in the strategy process is still relatively limited (Jarzabkowski, 2008). Given the prominent role of top managers in strategizing, there is clearly a need to investigate their activities and interactions in order to more fully understand how strategy is shaped in organizations. In recent years, a number of such studies have begun to appear (Balogun,  Bartunek, & Do, 2015; Edmondson, Roberto, & Watkins, 2003; Jarzabkowski, 2008; Jarzabkowski & Wilson, 2002; Kisfalvi, Sergi, & Langley, 2016; Liu & Maitlis, 2014; Ma & Seidl, 2016; Ma, Seidl, & Guérard, 2015; Samra-Fredericks, 2003), and it is the goal of this subtheme to focus on the activities of top managers and TMTs in strategizing to encourage the development and integration of emerging research in this area.  

    Studies on top managers and strategizing can advance strategy research in at least four areas. First, by exploring the activities and interactions of top managers inside and outside TMTs, studies can provide rich insights into the contextual, interpersonal, processual and temporal dynamics of strategizing at the apex of an organization (Denis, Lamothe, & Langley, 2001). Such insights can enrich our understanding of strategy as a dynamic phenomenon and help resolve the "black-box" problem frequently raised in connection with demographic research on strategic leadership (Lawrence, 1997). Second, scholars can generate insights into the intervening mechanisms linking strategy work and outcomes. For example, existing studies have shown the importance of certain TMT processes (e.g., behavioral integration) but we know little about how they can be managed to ensure the effectiveness of decision-making. Third, such studies can also provide a better understanding of the co-evolution between characteristics of top managers as strategists (e.g., identity or legitimacy) and their strategizing activities, a topic that is important but has been underexplored. Finally, we need to know more about the interactions between top-level managers and other managers as responsibility for strategic change spreads outwards and downwards and how this influences strategizing. 

    In order to explore the topics discussed above, we call for papers that deal with the various aspects of strategizing activities in which top managers and TMTs are involved. We are interested both in conceptual and empirical papers utilizing a range of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. Possible topics for contributions include, but are not restricted to the following issues:
    • Activities of top managers in forming and realizing strategies. How do top managers engage in front-stage and back-stage activities of strategizing? How do top managers translate strategic plans to strategic actions? How do they push strategies to the front line? How do top managers sequence their interventions in realizing a strategy or strategic change? 
    • Different types of top managers in strategizing. What are the strategic roles of different types of top managers, such as CEOs, functional managers, divisional managers, senior staff (e.g., strategy officer), and subsidiary executives? What are their particular challenges and how do they deal with them in strategizing? 
    • Interplay between top managers as strategists and their activities. How does a top manager's or a TMT's identity, legitimacy, image, reputation, emotions or power shape, enable or constrain their strategizing activities? How is a top manager's or a TMT's identity, legitimacy, image, reputation or power shaped by their strategizing activities and outcomes? 
    • TMT processes in strategizing and intervention. How do top managers interact in the TMT to develop and implement strategies? What are the behavioral processes and patterns in TMTs and how do they influence strategizing activities and outcomes? How do different types of TMTs (e.g., with divisional structure vs. functional structure) operate in strategizing? How do CEOs (or others) manage TMT processes to mitigate their negative influence?
    • TMT formation/evolution and its relation to strategy. How are TMTs formed and how does that influence their strategizing activities? What are the drivers and constraints of configuring a TMT? Why are particular individuals included or excluded? How do TMTs evolve over time in terms of their composition and processes? How do TMT processes and the strategizing activities co-evolve over time?
    • Strategizing of top managers and TMTs in various contexts. How do top managers and TMTs strategize in different organizational contexts, e.g., during fast growth vs. performance declining? How do top managers and TMTs strategize in different institutional (e.g., public organizations, NGOs, etc.) and cultural contexts? 

    Julia Balogun is Director of School and Professor of Strategic Management at University of Liverpool Management School, UK. Her research focuses on strategy­as­practice, with a particular interest in strategic change and renewal within large mature corporations. She has a concern for how strategic activity is initiated and championed at multiple levels within organizations, exploring the strategizing work of both senior executives and middle managers. Her work is widely published in journals such as 'Academy of Management Journal', 'Organization Studies', 'Organization Science', 'Journal of Management Studies', 'Journal of International Business Studies'. Her book "Exploring Strategic Change" is in its fourth edition.

    Shenghui Ma is Senior Researcher at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. His research focuses on CEO succession, top management team dynamics, strategic change and sensemaking. He is particularly interested in the dynamics of how CEOs interact with other actors inside and outside their TMT in strategic decision making. He is currently a representative­at­large for the Strategy Practice IG at the Strategic Management Society. His work has been published in 'International Journal of Management Reviews' and 'Strategic Management Journal'.

    Ann Langley is Chair in Strategic Management in Pluralistic Settings at HEC Montréal, Canada. Her research focuses on strategic change, top management team dynamics and the practice of strategy in complex organizations. She is particularly interested in process­oriented research and methodology. She has published over 70 articles in refereed journals and is coeditor of the journal 'Strategic Organization'. She is also coeditor with Haridimos Tsoukas of a book series 'Perspectives on Process Organization Studies' published by Oxford University Press. She is Adjunct Professor at Université de Montréal, the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) and University of Gothenburg, Sweden.


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dr. Shenghui Ma | Senior Researcher
    University of Zurich | Chair of Organization & Management
    Universitätstrasse 84 | 8006 Zurich | Switzerland
    Tel : +41 44 634 29 04