View Thread

  • 1.  EGOS 2017 - The Lived Experiences of Paradoxes; Call for Papers

    Posted 10-21-2016 03:03

    Colleagues - If you are studying paradoxes, dualities and dichotomies,we hope you will consider submitting you work for consideration at EGOS 2017. Please contact us if you have any questions. 


    Camille Pradies, Wendy Smith, Russ Vince





    Call for Papers

    Sub-Theme 9: The Lived Experiences of Paradoxes: Passions, Defenses and Competing Demands


    European Group for Organization Studies

    Copenhagen

    July 6-8, 2017

    Short Papers (3000 words) due – January 9, 2017

     

     

    Convenors:

    Camille Pradies

    EDHEC Business School, France

    camille.pradies@edhec.edu

     

    Wendy K. Smith

    University of Delaware, USA

    smithw@udel.edu

     

    Russ Vince

    University of Bath, United Kingdom

    r.vince@bath.ac.uk

    Call for Papers

     

    Paradoxes pervade our organizational experiences. These 'contradictory, yet interdependent elements' (Smith & Lewis, 2011) challenge our established certainties, while inviting our untapped creativity. Their dynamic, uncertain nature elicits strong emotional responses. Effectively seeing and engaging the power of paradox depends on the ability to be vulnerable and open, yet often their ambiguous and complex nature triggers defensiveness and resistance. Moreover, emotions themselves are often paradoxical – joy can elicit melancholy, while melancholy is often a precursor to joy. Even as our emotions critically inform our experience of paradox, our scholarship offers little insight into this relationship, focusing more acutely on the role of cognition and action (Schad et al., 2016).

     

    In this sub-theme, we continue to welcome research and scholarship that broadly addresses issues of organizational paradox. However, we also want to shine a light on the role of emotions in paradox, inviting scholars to question, examine and illuminate how we experience and respond to interdependent contradictions.

     

    Take, for example, the overall EGOS 2017 theme, "The Good Organization – Aspirations, Interventions, Struggles". Goodness is rarely straightforward and positive. It can be tinged with envy, conceal hatred, or provide the basis of emotive strategies for control. Within leadership roles, for example, we are not always aware of the interdependence of harm and helpfulness in our leadership behavior (Vince & Mazen, 2014). We hope and aspire to be 'good' leaders at the same time as we project the emotional force of our 'unwanted self' as a leader onto others (Petriglieri & Stein, 2012). The ongoing tensions and contradictions of our experience within such roles provide an opportunity to recognize organizations as complex environments of contrasting yet intersecting affective dynamics.

     

    It will be useful to examine further the everyday experiences, dynamics and impact of emotions such as ambivalence or anxiety that produce persistent, contradictory individual and collective experience. For example, ambivalence may surface latent paradoxical tensions and enhance our understanding of organizational life (Ashforth et al., 2014; Pratt & Pradies, 2011).

     

    In addition, there is a resurgence of interest in the inseparability of affect and power (Kenny & Fotaki, 2014; Thompson & Willmott, 2015). Also, explorations of psychoanalytic theory and paradox (Jarrett & Vince, 2017) may offer opportunities to better understand the impact of unconscious dynamics in generating contradictions, as well as the political effects of fantasy. Finding ways to study the paradoxical tensions mobilized by unconscious responses, defenses and fantasies can help us to understand more about the role of persistent contradictions in both limiting and liberating individual and collective behavior. Through a paradox lens we may be able to discover more about affective contradictions and their everyday practical and political implications in organizations.

     

    EGOS has provided a strong community for paradox scholars. In this Call for Papers, we continue to invite scholars to explore the dynamics of paradox broadly. We also hope this sub-theme will extend previous insights from an EGOS paradox sub-theme to invite a focus on theoretical and empirical papers that contribute to understanding the paradoxical interplay of emotions in organizations; emotional dynamics and processes of organizing that generate and support ongoing tensions; and the paradoxical links between emotions and power relations. There are several current avenues of scholarship on emotions that seem highly relevant to paradox studies. We outline some below:

    How can paradox studies help to understand the continuous interplay between rationality and emotion in organizations?

    In what ways can a paradox lens help us to comprehend affect as central to social and political analysis?

    What is the role of emotions – anxiety, ambivalence, vulnerability – in sustaining or leveraging paradoxical tensions? What are the consequences for management and organization?

    How can a paradox lens help to shine a new light on collective emotional dynamics?

    How can paradox studies help us to understand and improve existing theories of emotion and affect in organizations? How does paradox help us understand the relationship between different emotions? Or the relationship between emotions and cognition?

     

    Camille Pradies is Assistant Professor of Management at EDHEC Business School, France. Her research focuses on ambivalence and identity at the individual and group levels and on the organizational and institutional conditions that influence them.

    Wendy K. Smith is Associate Professor of Management in the Department of Business Administration, Lerner College of Business and Economics, University of Delaware, USA, a Research Fellow at the Judge School of Business, University of Cambridge, UK, and a Research Fellow at the University of Bath. Her research focuses on managing strategic paradoxes, including exploring/exploiting and social/financial goals.

    Russ Vince is Professor of Leadership and Change in the School of Management, University of Bath, UK, and Honorary Professor of Management at the University of St. Andrews, UK. His research has contributed to our understanding of emotion, reflection, learning, leadership and change in organizations.

     






    --

    Wendy SmithAssociate Professor of Business Administration
    234 Alfred Lerner Hall | University of Delaware | Newark, DE 19716
    302-831-1570smithw@udel.edu | @profwendysmith
    http://lerner.udel.edu/faculty-staff/wendy-k-smith





    --

    Wendy SmithAssociate Professor of Business Administration
    234 Alfred Lerner Hall | University of Delaware | Newark, DE 19716
    302-831-1570 | smithw@udel.edu | @profwendysmith
    http://lerner.udel.edu/faculty-staff/wendy-k-smith




  • 2.  EGOS 2017 - The Lived Experiences of Paradoxes; Call for Papers

    Posted 12-28-2016 08:50

    Dear colleagues,

    We would like to invite you to submit your short paper to this year's EGOS Colloquium sub-theme 9: The Lived Experiences of Paradoxes: Passions, Defenses and Competing Demands

    http://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1442567999321&subtheme_id=1442568082455

    The deadline for submitting your short paper is January 9, 2017. Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

    We hope to see you there.

    Camille Pradies, Wendy Smith, Russ Vince

     

     

     

    Call for Papers

    Sub-Theme 9: The Lived Experiences of Paradoxes: Passions, Defenses and Competing Demands

     

    European Group for Organization Studies

    Copenhagen,

    July 6-8, 2017

    Short Papers (3000 words) due – January 9, 2017

     

     

    Convenors:

    Camille Pradies

    EDHEC Business School, France

    camille.pradies@edhec.edu

     

    Wendy K. Smith

    University of Delaware, USA

    smithw@udel.edu

     

    Russ Vince

    University of Bath, United Kingdom

    r.vince@bath.ac.uk

     

     

    Call for Papers

     

    Paradoxes pervade our organizational experiences. These 'contradictory, yet interdependent elements' (Smith & Lewis, 2011) challenge our established certainties, while inviting our untapped creativity. Their dynamic, uncertain nature elicits strong emotional responses. Effectively seeing and engaging the power of paradox depends on the ability to be vulnerable and open, yet often their ambiguous and complex nature triggers defensiveness and resistance. Moreover, emotions themselves are often paradoxical – joy can elicit melancholy, while melancholy is often a precursor to joy. Even as our emotions critically inform our experience of paradox, our scholarship offers little insight into this relationship, focusing more acutely on the role of cognition and action (Schad et al., 2016).

     

    In this sub-theme, we continue to welcome research and scholarship that broadly addresses issues of organizational paradox. However, we also want to shine a light on the role of emotions in paradox, inviting scholars to question, examine and illuminate how we experience and respond to interdependent contradictions.

     

    Take, for example, the overall EGOS 2017 theme, "The Good Organization – Aspirations, Interventions, Struggles". Goodness is rarely straightforward and positive. It can be tinged with envy, conceal hatred, or provide the basis of emotive strategies for control. Within leadership roles, for example, we are not always aware of the interdependence of harm and helpfulness in our leadership behavior (Vince & Mazen, 2014). We hope and aspire to be 'good' leaders at the same time as we project the emotional force of our 'unwanted self' as a leader onto others (Petriglieri & Stein, 2012). The ongoing tensions and contradictions of our experience within such roles provide an opportunity to recognize organizations as complex environments of contrasting yet intersecting affective dynamics.

     

    It will be useful to examine further the everyday experiences, dynamics and impact of emotions such as ambivalence or anxiety that produce persistent, contradictory individual and collective experience. For example, ambivalence may surface latent paradoxical tensions and enhance our understanding of organizational life (Ashforth et al., 2014; Pratt & Pradies, 2011).

     

    In addition, there is a resurgence of interest in the inseparability of affect and power (Kenny & Fotaki, 2014; Thompson & Willmott, 2015). Also, explorations of psychoanalytic theory and paradox (Jarrett & Vince, 2017) may offer opportunities to better understand the impact of unconscious dynamics in generating contradictions, as well as the political effects of fantasy. Finding ways to study the paradoxical tensions mobilized by unconscious responses, defenses and fantasies can help us to understand more about the role of persistent contradictions in both limiting and liberating individual and collective behavior. Through a paradox lens we may be able to discover more about affective contradictions and their everyday practical and political implications in organizations.

     

    EGOS has provided a strong community for paradox scholars. In this Call for Papers, we continue to invite scholars to explore the dynamics of paradox broadly. We also hope this sub-theme will extend previous insights from an EGOS paradox sub-theme to invite a focus on theoretical and empirical papers that contribute to understanding the paradoxical interplay of emotions in organizations; emotional dynamics and processes of organizing that generate and support ongoing tensions; and the paradoxical links between emotions and power relations. There are several current avenues of scholarship on emotions that seem highly relevant to paradox studies. We outline some below:

    How can paradox studies help to understand the continuous interplay between rationality and emotion in organizations?

    In what ways can a paradox lens help us to comprehend affect as central to social and political analysis?

    What is the role of emotions – anxiety, ambivalence, vulnerability – in sustaining or leveraging paradoxical tensions? What are the consequences for management and organization?

    How can a paradox lens help to shine a new light on collective emotional dynamics?

    How can paradox studies help us to understand and improve existing theories of emotion and affect in organizations? How does paradox help us understand the relationship between different emotions? Or the relationship between emotions and cognition?

     

    Camille Pradies is Assistant Professor of Management at EDHEC Business School, France. Her research focuses on ambivalence and identity at the individual and group levels and on the organizational and institutional conditions that influence them.

    Wendy K. Smith is Associate Professor of Management in the Department of Business Administration, Lerner College of Business and Economics, University of Delaware, USA, a Research Fellow at the Judge School of Business, University of Cambridge, UK, and a Research Fellow at the University of Bath. Her research focuses on managing strategic paradoxes, including exploring/exploiting and social/financial goals.

    Russ Vince is Professor of Leadership and Change in the School of Management, University of Bath, UK, and Honorary Professor of Management at the University of St. Andrews, UK. His research has contributed to our understanding of emotion, reflection, learning, leadership and change in organizations.

     

     

    Camille Pradies

    Assistant Professor

    Management & Organization Department

    Office S4 220

    EDHEC BUSINESS SCHOOL

    24 avenue Gustave Delory - CS 50411 

    59057 Roubaix Cedex 1

    France

    Tel. : + 33 (0)3 20 15 44 47